The Biggest Investment Mistakes Retirees Make
What retirees get wrong time and time again with their investment strategies..
We all know that retirement changes the game entirely.
When you’re working, investing is mostly about accumulation. You contribute consistently, invest in diversified growth-oriented investments like stock funds, and let time do the heavy lifting.
When you retire, your investing approach tends to shift a bit.
You’re no longer exclusively concerned with growing your assets. Of course, you still need your retirement assets to grow faster than inflation, or you’re effectively losing purchasing power year to year.
The big reason for this change tends to be that your “time horizon”, when you’re needing to access and use the funds, diminishes. You now need to draw from your accounts.
And that has a material impact on your investment strategy. You can’t afford to fund your living expenses by selling stocks during a temporary market downturn. That’s why a portion of your portfolio should be positioned conservatively to cover near-term spending needs.
They come from well-meaning but generic advice, often articles found online, or suggestions from friends and family.
The problem is that this kind of advice rarely accounts for your personal circumstances and nuances, and when applied blindly, it can potentially have long-term consequences.
Here are the biggest ones I see.
1. Becoming Too Conservative Too Quickly
This is the most common mistake I see.
Retirement feels like a moment to “lock it in.”
After decades of saving, it’s natural to want safety and to ensure that you don’t “lose any money”.
Many retirees dramatically reduce their stock exposure right when they stop working, and again, the intention is understandable.
The problem is that retirement isn’t a 5-year window. It’s now a 25–30-year horizon.
If a portfolio becomes too conservative:
It may struggle to keep up with inflation,
Withdrawals can erode principal faster,
And long-term purchasing power can quietly decline.
On top of that, if you’re someone who expects to receive a healthy amount of guaranteed income from Social Security, a pension, rental properties, or similar sources, you may not need to tap your retirement accounts in the near term.
In that case, it can make sense to maintain a meaningful allocation to long-term growth, since you aren’t relying heavily on those assets year to year to fund your lifestyle.
All of this is to say, retirement isn’t automatically the time to turn the portfolio risk knob all the way to “100% conservative.”
Volatility is a real concern in retirement, but so is the risk of outliving your money!
Trying to eliminate one risk entirely can unintentionally increase the other.
2. Holding Too Much Cash for Too Long
Following a similar theme to the first point, cash feels safe. It doesn’t fluctuate. There’s no risk of logging into your bank account, high-yield savings account, CD, or money market fund and seeing a lower balance than the last time you checked (assuming you haven’t withdrawn money or incurred fees).
In that sense, there’s no true “market” risk with these investments.
But excess cash creates its own risk, especially in retirement.
Keeping 1–2 years of spending in cash or cash equivalents (such as money-market or CDs) in retirement can make sense as a buffer.
Holding 6–8 years because markets “feel high” or “might drop” is a different story.
Over time, cash doesn’t keep pace with long-term inflation, which historically runs around 2.5% to 3%.
Over a 25- to 30-year retirement, holding excess cash can quietly erode purchasing power and reduce the long-term value of your savings.
That may translate into less future spending flexibility, or a smaller inheritance for your children, grandchildren, or charitable causes.
3. Investing Without an Income Plan
Some retirees focus heavily on asset allocation but never clearly define how income will be generated.
Retirement investing isn’t just about percentages of stocks and bonds. It’s about how assets translate into reliable, sustainable income.
Without an income strategy:
withdrawals can become reactive,
tax decisions become accidental,
and market volatility feels more threatening than it needs to.
This is why I like to start by clearly identifying how much income actually needs to come from the portfolio each year.
Once that number is defined, the investment strategy can be built around it. The portion of the portfolio needed for near-term withdrawals should be positioned more conservatively to protect spending from market volatility. Meanwhile, assets that won’t be needed for many years can remain invested with a greater emphasis on long-term growth. In other words, the strategy should align with the purpose and timing of the dollars, protect what’s needed soon, and grow what isn’t.
Example:
Let’s say that you need $7,000/mo. net in retirement. You are slated to receive $2,000/mo. from Social Security.
That means that you need your portfolio to provide you with $5,000/mo. in income, or $60,000 a year.
You should build your portfolio model to have $120,000 - $180,000 (two to three years of your monthly portfolio distribution needs) in conservative assets like cash, money market funds, CD’s, etc.
From there, an additional few years of projected portfolio withdrawals can be allocated to slightly higher-yielding bond funds.
The remaining assets can then be positioned more growth-oriented, since that portion of the portfolio won’t be needed for many years.
With that longer time horizon, the market has historically had time to recover, even if a near-term recession or downturn occurs along the way.
Your portfolio should support your retirement paycheck, not just exist as an asset allocation pie chart on your Schwab, Fidelity, or Vanguard statement.
4. Reacting to Market Headlines
This one is probably quite obvious?
Market downturns aren’t fun for anyone. Period.
However, when you’re still working, they usually feel more inconvenient than threatening. You might be annoyed that your accounts are temporarily down, but you also know you won’t need that money for many years. With a long time horizon, markets have historically had ample time to recover.
When you’re retired, they can feel personal.
A 20% market decline isn’t just an inconvenience; it feels like something very material and potentially problematic!
The flood of emotions that accompany a market decline can lead an individual to:
Reduce their stock exposure at the wrong time,
Delaying needed withdrawals out of fear,
Or, abandoning a long-term allocation altogether for something more “safe” and “secure” like cash.
But a good retirement portfolio should be designed with volatility in mind.
Down years are not a failure on your part; they are expected and usually arrive two or three out of every ten years.
However, the real mistake made is not trusting the long-term plan that you have set forth, which includes the assumptions of periodic market declines. You must trust your plan.
5. Ignoring Tax Efficiency in Investment Decisions
Retirees often think about “returns” without thinking about after-tax returns.
In retirement, taxes become more intertwined with investment decisions:
Capital gains,
Dividend income,
Social Security taxation,
Medicare premium thresholds.
Asset location, which investments (stocks, bonds, cash, etc.) you hold in which accounts, can matter just as much as the allocation itself.
For example, pre-tax retirement accounts like traditional IRAs and 401(k)s are eventually taxed as ordinary income when withdrawn.
Because of that, they’re often a natural home for assets that are already tax-inefficient, such as bond funds or income-producing investments. Interest income from bonds is taxed at ordinary income rates anyway, so holding those assets inside a tax-deferred account can prevent that income from spilling onto your current tax return.
Roth accounts, on the other hand, grow tax-free and are not subject to required minimum distributions.
That makes them particularly powerful for assets with higher long-term growth potential, broadly diversified stock funds, for instance, where the compounding can occur without future tax drag.
Taxable brokerage accounts sit somewhere in between. They can be well-suited for tax-efficient equity index funds, which tend to generate qualified dividends and long-term capital gains taxed at preferential rates.
They also provide flexibility, since capital gains are only realized when assets are sold and can sometimes be managed strategically.
When assets are placed without regard to tax location, friction builds quietly. Holding high-yield bond funds in a taxable account may unnecessarily increase annual taxable income. Placing lower-growth assets inside a Roth account may limit the long-term value of that tax-free space.
On paper, two portfolios can look identical from an allocation standpoint.
But once taxes are layered in, the outcomes can be meaningfully different.
In retirement, it’s not just about what you own, but about where you own it.
The Real Thread Connecting These Mistakes
None of the above errors are dramatic; they’re usually well-intentioned.
Most retirees don’t blow up their portfolios by overconcentrating in a particular stock or cryptocurrency.
They might become slightly too conservative, slightly too reactive, slightly too cash-heavy.
Over a 25-year retirement, this “slightly” compounds in dramatic fashion.
The goal in retirement has NEVER been to eliminate risk.
It’s to balance:
growth,
stability,
income reliability,
and tax efficiency.
That balance evolves, and it isn’t set once and forgotten about!
Have any questions about what you’ve read? Let’s talk about them!
Read My Other Work!
